• Hey, guys! FreeOnes Tube is up and running - see for yourself!
  • FreeOnes Now Listing Male and Trans Performers! More info here!

BREXIT ~ British Exit Referendum on the 23rd of June

pool_hustler

Be careful what you wish for, it might come true!
I say EVERY Muslim or "immigrant" "refugee" from any Muslim majority country should be deported from any Western nation UNTIL any of the aforementioned cocksuckers (SA, UAE, Kuwait, etc) take in one god damn of their own.

On what possible legal basis? You're talking about deporting MILLIONS of law abiding citizens. That's emotion-ruling-logic talk.

Included among those millions would be several thousand here in the U.S. who either have previously or are currently honorably serving in our military. Think about that for a moment.

Need I point out all the attacks in Europe and how that will absolutely only increase when they make up almost 1 in 10 in Europe?

How can you possibly know that? That's 15 years from now, and the situation may evolve into something very different by then. Matter of fact I expect it likely will, so long as we aren't stupid enough to be goaded into turning a war against terror into a war against Islam.
 

larss

I'm watching some specialist videos
It appears that even the Scott that is bloodshot has got the wrong end of the stick as far as immigration goes. It does not include the Muslim masses that keep being talked about. Our membership of the EU has absolutely NOTHING to do with refugees. The UK has agreed to take a very small number. in 2015, the UK received 38,878 asylum applications (including dependents).
This was less than Germany (431,000), Sweden (163,000), and Hungary (163,000).
Those going to other EU states do not have the right to enter the UK. They are not EU citizens and the UK is not part of the Schengen Area which allows passportless travel between those countries.
 

Bloodshot Scott

I'm too lazy to set a usertitle.
It appears that even the Scott that is bloodshot has got the wrong end of the stick as far as immigration goes. It does not include the Muslim masses that keep being talked about. Our membership of the EU has absolutely NOTHING to do with refugees. The UK has agreed to take a very small number. in 2015, the UK received 38,878 asylum applications (including dependents).
This was less than Germany (431,000), Sweden (163,000), and Hungary (163,000).
Those going to other EU states do not have the right to enter the UK. They are not EU citizens and the UK is not part of the Schengen Area which allows passportless travel between those countries.

Yeah...they don't want Poles or others coming in as well, but the EU can/will force them to take ragheads, and don't tell me London hasn't been plagued with Muslim undesirables, from what I understand London isn't even recognizable to what it was 20-30 years ago...evidence by putting a Muslim shit head into the Mayoral seat!
 

cronus100

Looking to go where no FreeOnes member has gone before!
It takes a very brave prime minister of any country to put the membership of their state to the vote of their people. True to his word David Cameron asked the people in May 2015 "If a Conservative Government is returned to Westminister, the people will be given a referendum on whether the UK should continue their membership of the European Union or leave the Union"
Now David Cameron need not have given the referendum as Parliament decides on laws and treaties usually. But he did.
Sometimes the people go with you and give you the victory. Other times, the people give you a bloody nose at the ballot box.
I do not think it is right to start attacking the British over the referendum result. I wonder how many prime ministers in the other member states of the European Union would come out and say "We will put our membership up for referendum".
My guess would be not many.
 

Bloodshot Scott

I'm too lazy to set a usertitle.
I say EVERY Muslim or "immigrant" "refugee" from any Muslim majority country should be deported from any Western nation UNTIL any of the aforementioned cocksuckers (SA, UAE, Kuwait, etc) take in one god damn of their own.

On what possible legal basis? You're talking about deporting MILLIONS of law abiding citizens. That's emotion-ruling-logic talk.

Included among those millions would be several thousand here in the U.S. who either have previously or are currently honorably serving in our military. Think about that for a moment.

Need I point out all the attacks in Europe and how that will absolutely only increase when they make up almost 1 in 10 in Europe?

How can you possibly know that? That's 15 years from now, and the situation may evolve into something very different by then. Matter of fact I expect it likely will, so long as we aren't stupid enough to be goaded into turning a war against terror into a war against Islam.

It was a sort (optimistically hopeful) rhetorical comment. Maybe some day down the road Europeans will grow a pair and exile all the undesirable shithead devil worshipers when they start blowing more and more Europeans up.
 

Mayhem

Banned
Yeah...they don't want Poles or others coming in as well, but the EU can/will force them to take ragheads, and don't tell me London hasn't been plagued with Muslim undesirables, from what I understand London isn't even recognizable to what it was 20-30 years ago...evidence by putting a Muslim shit head into the Mayoral seat!

I don't know what you're remembering, but 20-30 years ago London was a shithole and it certainly didn't fail to make the news...repeatedly.

Seems like not everyone agrees with the UK leaving the EU

Petition for UK Brexit revote hits 3mn signatures in just 2 days
https://www.rt.com/uk/348437-brexit-petition-parliament-millons/

Scotland presses ahead with plans for new independence vote

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/scotland-independence-vote-eu-brexit_us_576e65e2e4b0dbb1bbbaba98

I popped in here to post the same thing. I love how Trump has handcuffed himself to all this. Because this is exactly what will happen on Election Day+1 if people wake up and find out that Bonespur the Illustrious is their new President. "Shit, really? He actually fucking WON? Any chance for a do-over? I mean....y'know.....just because I voted for him in a fit of righteous indignation doesn't mean I wanted him to WIN."
 

meesterperfect

Hiliary 2020
Seems like not everyone agrees with the UK leaving the EU

Petition for UK Brexit revote hits 3mn signatures in just 2 days
https://www.rt.com/uk/348437-brexit-petition-parliament-millons/

Scotland presses ahead with plans for new independence vote

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/scotland-independence-vote-eu-brexit_us_576e65e2e4b0dbb1bbbaba98

That is what confuses me about Scotland.
They want to break away from the UK but yet they voted to stay in the EU by a bigger margin than any other part of Britain.
That's if you trust election results.
Wouldn't it be easier to break away from Britain now that they are going to be out of the EU as they are apparently trying to do already?
The logic of Scots voting to stay part of the EU seems counter to what they say they want.
Freedom!!!!!
 

meesterperfect

Hiliary 2020
They're shit, and their "religion" is utter SHIT. They have no business in Europe, none whatsoever..and they have ill intentions, make no mistake about it. Need I point out all the attacks in Europe and how that will absolutely only increase when they make up almost 1 in 10 in Europe?

1st bodies numbers are wrong. Europe or more precisely Western Europe and Scandinavia are only so big. And there are millions of Middle Easterners and Africans coming into those countries.
It's definitely a culture changer. It's definitely a big deal.
They didn't vote in a Muslim mayor in London because there are only 5% of them.

But BS look at the big picture. This is all part of a very well structured plan.
It goes something like this:
1- create a European Union under one currency owned by a few trillionaires who control the politicians.
2- Make sure all the leaders of the countries in the EU are bought and paid for puppets who will do what the banker trillioniares tell them to do.
3- Invade, occupy, and bomb the hell out of as many Middle East and North African countries as they can and never stop until either they are all destroyed or WWIII, whichever comes first.
4- After these countries are ruined in pretty much every way possible and taken over by Radical Muslims or US puppet leaders allow as many as possible of the people from those countries to migrate to European countries against the wishes of most of the people in those countries.
This is the point at which they are at now. So what's the next step in this plan?

I'm not defending the Muslims in Europe who are nogoodniks. The ones raping women and children and beating up white kids at schools.
This is happening no doubt. With mass immigration you are going to get the scumbag criminal types first.

In the big picture the people in these countries where these refugees are coming from would like nothing more than to have their countries back.
Back to the way they were before the US and NATO carpet bombed them, handed them over to radical muslim mercenaries and ruined their lives.

Libya, Iraq, Yemen for example are constantly fighting to get their countries back. And the people who they are fighting with are armed and paid by the US, England, Israel, and Saudi Arabia mostly with borrowed money by those same trillionaires at the top of the pyramid. Syria is fighting for them not to be next despite all the threats and interference by the US and Nato.

It's a big plan of world domination and control of the masses. This is why Russia and China are now "agressors" and threats. It seems theyre not on board with it.
And then there's this which I believe is very true.
http://www.renegadetribune.com/the-refugee-crisis-and-the-creation-of-greater-israel/

And the attacks in Europe. If you mean the bombings and mass shootings?
They are only going to stop when people start to wake up and see that almost all of these attacks follow the same exact blueprint and are mostly false flag events planned and carried out by a shadow government of intelligence agencys and covered up and presented by a media who is also in on it.
This is the point we've reached and it's so obvious.
 

Johan

I'm too lazy to set a usertitle.
That is what confuses me about Scotland.
They want to break away from the UK but yet they voted to stay in the EU by a bigger margin than any other part of Britain.
That's if you trust election results.
Wouldn't it be easier to break away from Britain now that they are going to be out of the EU as they are apparently trying to do already?
The logic of Scots voting to stay part of the EU seems counter to what they say they want.
Freedom!!!!!

Two years ago when Scotland had a referendum on wether or not they would stay in the UK -which concluded with a "Stay" victory (55%)-, the "Leave" campaign made it clear that once independant from the UK, Scotland would apply toEU membership.
Now that the UK voted to leave the EU, Scotland wants to leave the UK to be able then to aplly for EU membership.

A large majority of Scottish voted "Stay" and are now unhappy with the "Leave" victory.

maptitude-brexit-map.jpg


As you can see on this map, Northern Ireland also voted "Stay". Therefore, this "leave" victory could start troubles in this part of the UK, which had been plagued by a religious-nationalist civil war/terrorism era for almost 30 years ( 1968-1998) between the Irish Republican Army (IRA) and the Bristish Armed Forces.
 

cronus100

Looking to go where no FreeOnes member has gone before!
With the turmoil in the UK after the European Union vote last week, would Westminister give its approval for another Independence vote in Scotland so soon after the last vote? That's the 60 billion euro question.
Scotland's Assembly could have the power to stop the rest of the UK going ahead with lodging withdrawal from the EU as per Article 50 of the Lisbon Treaty but only if that power was included in the original legisation used to set up the Assembly.
When the Referendum for Independence was taking place a couple of years ago, there were keen observers on the Continent and they were not eager for the vote to go through. Because if Scotland did vote for independence from the UK , those governments would have to give independence referendums to regions in their "backyard".
Such as the Spanish with Catalonia and the Basque region.
And I think Corsica would like to say "Au Revoir" to France
 

Johan

I'm too lazy to set a usertitle.
1st bodies numbers are wrong. Europe or more precisely Western Europe and Scandinavia are only so big. And there are millions of Middle Easterners and Africans coming into those countries.
It's definitely a culture changer. It's definitely a big deal.
They didn't vote in a Muslim mayor in London because there are only 5% of them.
They didn't vote for a muslim mayor. They voted for a mayor from the Labour party, a man who do know the challenges that the people of London faces since he's frommodest origin (his father was a bus driver). and who happens to be a muslim.
What you fail ton understand is that, in Europe, people aren't as much influenced by religion when considering politics.
 
With the turmoil in the UK after the European Union vote last week, would Westminister give its approval for another Independence vote in Scotland so soon after the last vote? That's the 60 billion euro question.
Scotland's Assembly could have the power to stop the rest of the UK going ahead with lodging withdrawal from the EU as per Article 50 of the Lisbon Treaty but only if that power was included in the original legisation used to set up the Assembly.
When the Referendum for Independence was taking place a couple of years ago, there were keen observers on the Continent and they were not eager for the vote to go through. Because if Scotland did vote for independence from the UK , those governments would have to give independence referendums to regions in their "backyard".
Such as the Spanish with Catalonia and the Basque region.
And I think Corsica would like to say "Au Revoir" to France


The Scottish Assembly doesn't have the power to stop Brexit.

http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-scotland-36635012
 

Luxman

#TRE45ON

Straight Shooter

1,000 posts to go for my own user title!
That explains the exasperation of a BBC Radio 5 host who was talking to "leave" campaigner Nigel Evans.

Host: "Was it not inferred that if you vote 'leave,' immigration would go down?"

Evans: "Well, we said we would control it, and that is the most important point."

Host: "Control it by bringing it down, Nigel?"

Evans: "No, but there are two differences here, and this is where there is some misunderstanding."

Evans goes on to offer some background on how the "leave" campaign's immigration promises were made, but the host cuts him off.

Host: "Straight question, straight answer, Nigel. Will immigration fall significantly when the U.K. leaves the E.U.?"

Suffice it to say that Evans does not have a straight answer.
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/ct-brexit-leaders-20160626-story.html

The Leave campaign are now walking back almost every one of their promises.
 
Top